This is my wish list:
- From OGC:
- A way to publish multiple versions of the GeoPackage specification on geopackage.org (right now it just shows the working version)
- Speedy adoption of GeoPackage 1.0.2
- A repeatable process for producing HTML (and possibly other document types) from AsciiDoc so that we can easily publish other draft specifications in an easily readable form
- Commitment to encourage other SWGs to use the GitHub-based specification process that we pioneered here
- For users to automatically get added as observers in the project portal when they accept an observer agreement (you have no idea how big a nuisance this is!)
- From developers and/or software vendors:
- More content for geopackage.org, particularly FAQs and guidance on how to use the trickier parts of the standard (e.g., some of the extensions)
- Accurate, timely information on what products support what versions and/or portions of the standard
- From data providers:
- A commitment to publish their geospatial data as GeoPackage and/or GeoJSON instead of or in addition to proprietary formats or arcane government formats
- Feedback on what works well (or doesn't work well)
- From Image Matters (my employer):
- Support to continue in my role as SWG chair regardless of fickle funding situations
- A proper retirement sendoff for Paul Daisey, without whom GeoPackage never would have gotten this far
No comments:
Post a Comment